L&E Research
Participate
Client login
Bid request
  • Focus areas
    • L&E Health
    • L&E Consumer
    • L&E Insights
    • L&E Legal
  • Facilities
  • Capabilities
    • Qualitative & Quantitative Recruitment
    • Video Streaming
    • Virtual and Remote Facilities
    • Partnerships
    • Client Portal
  • Resources
    • Information Security for Our Clients
    • Member Privacy Policy
  • Meet us
  • Contact
  • Focus areas
    • L&E Health
    • L&E Consumer
    • L&E Insights
    • L&E Legal
  • Facilities
  • Capabilities
    • Qualitative & Quantitative Recruitment
    • Video Streaming
    • Virtual and Remote Facilities
    • Partnerships
    • Client Portal
  • Resources
    • Information Security for Our Clients
    • Member Privacy Policy
  • Meet us
  • Contact

The Human Touch in High-Tech Research: A 2024 Outlook on Industry Trends

DWG Admin on November 6, 2024

Our 7th annual Future Trends in Research and Technology webinar brought together leaders in the market research industry to discuss how innovations are reshaping the field. Featuring Barry Jennings from Microsoft, Charlie Rader from Procter & Gamble (P&G), Lenny Murphy from Greenbook, and Brett Watkins and Kelli Hammock from L&E Research, the panel delved into advancements in AI, synthetic data, insourcing, and participant experience. This discussion provided a nuanced look at the balance between embracing technology and maintaining a human-centered approach in research.

AI: Separating Hype from Reality

Artificial intelligence was at the forefront of the conversation, with panelists discussing the distinction between buzz and practical applications. Barry Jennings from Microsoft opened with an insightful take: “I’m not too worried about Terminator or The Matrix just yet.” He shared how Microsoft’s AI efforts focus on tangible improvements, from automating mundane tasks to enhancing the value of qualitative research assets. “What do we do with all those transcripts, videos, etc., and make them more useful research assets?” Jennings asked, emphasizing that AI’s role at Microsoft is less about futuristic scenarios and more about creating efficiencies that allow researchers to focus on deeper insights.

Charlie Rader from P&G added to the conversation by describing AI as a “new operating system” for research. Rader highlighted how P&G leverages AI through external vendors who provide tailored solutions specific to their research needs. “I’m looking for vendors and solutions that have done some of the lifting in that space so that it’s easily moving on into talking with people, getting the conversations done, and then synthesizing to what’s next,” he explained. This focus on customized AI tools underscores P&G’s commitment to actionable insights rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.

Synthetic Data: Enhancing Flexibility and Privacy

When the discussion shifted to synthetic data, Lenny Murphy of Greenbook offered a balanced view of its transformative potential. Synthetic data allows researchers to explore scenarios without compromising privacy, but Murphy noted the limitations: “It’s useful…but it is—I mean, it’s probably the oldest story in market research. You know, Henry Ford said if you would’ve asked people what they wanted, they would’ve said faster horses.” Murphy’s perspective highlights synthetic data’s strengths in testing and simulation while cautioning that it may fall short in truly novel or disruptive research.

Barry Jennings echoed Murphy’s sentiments, observing that synthetic data works best when built on specific, high-quality datasets. “If I were to inform and create synthetic data with a company’s data…that’s going to be way better than a generalized model,” he stated, noting that synthetic data’s effectiveness improves significantly when customized to a particular client’s data environment. Jennings highlighted that while synthetic data has its place, real-world validation remains essential for groundbreaking research decisions.

Insourcing: A Strategy for Enhanced Control

The trend toward insourcing, or developing in-house research capabilities, was a prominent theme. Brett Watkins of L&E Research described how insourcing allows organizations to retain control over their data while reducing reliance on third-party vendors. This approach allows brands to ensure data consistency and alignment with their broader organizational strategies.

In contrast, Barry Jennings offered Microsoft’s hybrid approach, which combines internal research with strategic partnerships. “We believe in having a set of research partners who go deep,” he shared, explaining that working closely with select vendors allows Microsoft to manage its high demand for research without compromising quality. By reserving internal resources for customer-centric projects and relying on trusted partners for other initiatives, Microsoft is able to maintain a flexible yet reliable research structure.

Participant Experience and Sample Quality

Participant experience and sample quality were also top priorities for the panelists. Kelli Hammock from L&E Research emphasized the importance of creating a seamless experience for participants, remarking, “They don’t mind the screening process so much, but they do mind that they’re not being compensated for it.” Hammock explained how incentivizing even the initial stages of research can improve participant engagement. “We’ve seen our engagement rate go from, I believe, 10% up to almost 30%,” she shared, referencing a recent pilot program. By acknowledging participants’ time and effort, the industry can foster trust and increase engagement.

Charlie Rader highlighted the value of treating participants respectfully, noting, “We got to recognize that these are busy moms and dads…and they are taking valuable time out of their lives to be able to share their thoughts with us.” This human-centered approach aligns with P&G’s commitment to treating respondents as valued contributors rather than mere data points.

Strategic Implications and Future Outlook

Throughout the webinar, the panelists emphasized the need for a thoughtful approach to adopting new technologies. Lenny Murphy shared a pragmatic view on the current landscape of AI adoption. “Adoption is still in the infancy, the beginning of the adoption curve,” he explained, pointing out that while AI use is growing, it hasn’t reached mainstream levels across all companies. Murphy predicted that as AI tools evolve, market research would face shifts similar to those seen in quantitative research when automation initially emerged, with AI potentially transforming qualitative research as well.

Barry Jennings highlighted AI’s potential to streamline decision-making processes within Microsoft. He shared an example of an AI tool that could quickly answer questions that would otherwise take weeks of traditional research, noting, “It allowed that analyst to go do something that would fit into a bigger bucket.” Such applications demonstrate how AI can empower researchers to focus on high-value tasks, optimizing both time and resources.

Refining the Signal

The panelists agreed that while technology offers transformative potential, human insight remains central to meaningful research. Charlie Rader highlighted the importance of focusing on data quality and precision, noting, “We are trying to reduce the noise in our data sets to improve the signal…whether that is better screening [or] use of synthetic data.” Lenny Murphy reinforced this view, discussing the need for a thoughtful approach to engaging participants and the broader public: “We do have to do a better job of engaging with folks. We have to do a better job of creating a value exchange, a fair value exchange for their time.”

The 7th annual Future Trends in Research and Technology webinar concluded with a unified message: technology and human insight should work together to advance the field of market research. As Jennings remarked, the current pace of innovation is unparalleled, but “it’s a journey to figure out” how best to integrate these tools. The panel’s insights offer a roadmap for navigating this rapidly changing landscape, where AI, synthetic data, and participant-centric strategies can empower researchers to generate more meaningful and impactful insights.

Recipe for the perfect qual panel: Step Six

DWG Admin on February 2, 2024

Recipe for the perfect qual panel

Step Six: How to Make it Happen 

Welcome back to our ongoing series uncovering the key ingredients behind the perfect qualitative panel. In this edition, we’re diving into the behind-the-scenes elements that make the process seamless and effective – from the importance of the team’s expertise to the technological prowess driving operations.

Experience and Background

When working on recruiting the perfect qual panel, finding the right partner is key. Having a team that brings years of hands-on experience from various facets of qualitative recruitment is paramount for success. At L&E for example, we value internal growth, often promoting from within, fostering a team culture that thrives on diverse expertise and shared best practices. Each year, we dedicate hundreds of hours to equip our teams with the latest insights and expertise in qualitative research.

How to measure success

While profit and revenue are integral, it’s important to prioritize comprehensive metrics that foster accountability and maintain top-notch quality across all service areas. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), such as profits, revenue, and cash flow only tell part of the story; equally important are the metrics implemented that enable employees to understand where they fit into the bigger picture of the company. L&E Research has spent years developing metrics that create a culture of accountability. Our metrics are built not only to drive fiscal success, but most are built to ensure a consistent level of quality in all service areas. From show rates to panel expansion goals, these metrics ensure consistency and success.

Proprietary Technology and Virtual Facility:

To help the recruitment process run smoothly you can rely on advanced technology. Our Facility Manager Plus (FMP), serves as the backbone of our operations. FMP is a robust platform that streamlines recruiting, project management, and onsite services. It boasts advanced features like keyword search, automated quota tracking, and client-accessible recruitment status updates 24/7.

Technology also plays a key role since the demand for virtual facilities in qualitative research has surged, reshaping the landscape of how studies are conducted. Our Virtual Facility, powered by industry-leading video-conferencing platforms such as Zoom and Teams, offers a virtual backroom experience for clients. With streaming capabilities to the Client Portal, this feature enables chat functions, video markers, and clip editing tools, allowing seamless collaboration and observation during sessions.

Commitment to expertise, innovation, and the right technology isn’t just about meeting research needs; it’s about pushing the boundaries of what’s possible to achieve high quality qualitative research. Our journey through these fundamental elements concludes here, but the quest for excellence in qualitative research continues.

Recipe for the perfect qual panel: Step Five

DWG Admin on November 29, 2023

Recipe for the perfect qual panel

Step Five: Quality Control for Qualitative Excellence 

To ensure the success of your qualitative research, maintaining high quality-control is imperative across all industries. But don’t worry, you’ve made it this far. By following the next steps, you’ll be well on your way to creating a top-notch qualitative panel. We’ll be exploring the dual realms of professional and government verification, emphasizing meticulous scrutiny in various fields, from healthcare to business research. Our journey continues with insights into the confirmation process and inventive strategies, serving as a guide for fostering participant commitment. Finally, we’ll delve into the tech-savvy approach, underscoring the significance of technological excellence in crafting insightful and impactful qualitative research panels.

Professional and Government Verification

Ensuring the integrity of research participants involves professional and identity verification. In any field, meticulous vetting is always crucial. Utilizing resources such as LinkedIn, WebMD, corporate websites, and email domains, professionals’ backgrounds and expertise can be verified to make sure you know who you’re getting involved with. Identity verification on a personal level is also a fundamental requirement, necessitating the collection of a government ID for all research. This process is especially critical when dealing with sensitive or confidential information. By taking a dual verification approach you can make sure that your commitment to maintaining the highest standards of participant integrity in research initiatives shines through.

Confirmation Process and Incentive Options

High participant engagement and commitment are priorities, but how can we get this? The most important step to ensure that recruits follow through on their commitment is communication. This applies to both verbal and written communications. Panelists want to know what is expected of them so that they take their research commitment seriously, requiring a strategic approach to confirmation and incentivization. Your confirmation process should leave nothing to the imagination, including verbal recruitment calls and detailed confirmation emails. A multi-phased approach ensures clarity, and a systematic tracking system guarantees timely reminders and follow-ups. Your participants have taken the time out of their day to help you get what they need! Return the favor by offering various incentive choices, spanning from electronic gift certificates to tangible ones, recognizing the participants’ efforts and time. This practice aids in nurturing their dedication to qualitative research endeavors.

Double and Triple Checking

A robust double-checking process is the make or break of a great panel. Rescreening should never be overlooked and should be conducted onsite during check-in. This serves as a critical step in verifying how consistent participant responses are and evaluating their suitability. This initial check is pivotal in upholding the quality of selected participants. In the virtual environment, a meticulous check-in process is equally essential. Taking the time to collaborate with clients to establish project expectations and technical requirements is an often overlooked factor in ensuring there is no room for oversight. Recruits should be screened for technology proficiency, and when needed, thorough technology checks – which should be conducted in advance to prevent potential issues. Comprehensive double-checking approaches safeguard the integrity of the research process, offering a reliable guide for qualitative studies irrespective of any potential research platform used.

Building a successful qualitative research panel demands meticulous attention. By adopting a dual verification approach—professionally and through government verification—participants’ integrity remains paramount. Clear communication and strategic incentives ensure commitment, while thorough check-ins and technology readiness screenings secure the panel’s reliability. These steps provide a reliable guide for maintaining high standards across qualitative studies, making the process both achievable and rewarding.

Unleashing the Power of MROCs to Achieve Better Business Insights

DWG Admin on June 6, 2023

Unleashing the Power of MROCs to Achieve Better Business Insights

The concept of research has evolved significantly, moving towards a hybrid approach that combines qualitative and quantitative methods. This shift has been influenced by various factors, with COVID-19 being a significant game-changer. The pandemic forced in-person research to come to a halt, leading to the rise of online and digital methodologies. The integration of platforms like Zoom allowed for asynchronous studies, where participants engage in activities over a period of time and then follow up with in-depth interviews or focus groups. This hybrid approach has become the norm, with simultaneous or sequential qualitative and quantitative studies being conducted.

Best practices in this new landscape involve leveraging the strengths of both asynchronous and live engagement. Asynchronous methods offer a less intrusive and more convenient way for participants to share their experiences, while live interactions build on the insights gained from the initial asynchronous phase. The hybrid approach also allows for larger teams to be involved in research without overwhelming participants, as the digital aspect provides a more private and comfortable environment. The cost benefits of digital research and the ability to immerse larger audiences in the process are additional advantages of this approach. Overall, the hybrid method enhances the research experience, allowing for deeper insights and more focused discussions.

It’s important to recognize the role of technology, particularly in hybrid activity communities. Video-based interactions and projective techniques, such as storytelling and collage tools, are effective methods for obtaining in-depth insights and emotional context from participants.

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools can assist researchers in analyzing and aggregating data, providing summaries, and generating insights. However, there is a consensus that AI cannot replace the human touch and expertise in research. While AI has its benefits in processing large amounts of data, the interpretation and synthesis of information still require the strategic thinking and understanding of a skilled researcher. AI can enhance efficiency in research but cannot replace the critical thinking and storytelling abilities of human researchers. The human element, empathy, and understanding of human behavior remain essential in delivering valuable insights to clients.  Overall, there are both benefits and challenges when using AI in market research, but transparency, communication, and a human-centric approach in leveraging these technologies is key.

When using research technology platforms to collect data, it’s crucial to have a strong support system in place.  Brand researchers, recruitment providers, and research panelists will all engage with the platform.  Humans naturally have a varied level of comfort when engaging with technology, so it’s important to have a strong support team of humans that can guide each audience.  While an instructional video would suffice in many cases, if users are challenged by technology, lost insights may be the unnecessary cost.

Having the right partners to support recruitment is equally important. An experienced partner can make methodological recommendations to successfully execute research. They are experts at managing the logistical needs, maintaining transparency and communication, and setting expectations with panelists throughout the process. Good partners will advise researchers on best practices applicable to a variety of approaches, including: the necessity of a kickoff call, minimizing extraneous touchpoints, avoiding changes to research expectations, and prompt communication with recruits. Calibrating incentives to match the tasks involved will promote engagement and discourage participant drop-off. Granting access to project managers in technology platforms is suggested to monitor participation and handle logistical demands, allowing researchers to focus on the research.

The importance of balancing cost, speed, and quality in research projects is critical, yet often difficult to achieve. Quantitative research can be faster and cheaper but qualitative research does not have to be sacrificed. The application of mixed methods, utilizing both synchronous (such as video interviews) and asynchronous (such as activity-based research) approaches, increases the potential of successfully balancing all variables to meet research objectives.

Hybrid research approaches are a great solution when both quantitative and qualitative research are necessary. Hybrid approaches can offer the trifecta of cost, quality, and speed. For example, participants are screened and qualified for a panel with a simple quantitative survey as the first activity. Screeners should always be concise and only include qualifying questions, but using the quant survey to both collect data and expand screening can allow researchers to narrow the participant pool in a very deliberate manner prior to the qualitative phases, selecting only the candidates that are most appropriate based on the activities expected. Costs are low due to a single recruiting fee and minimal recontacting.  Quality is high as responses to previous phases can be leveraged to select the strongest candidates for a variety of activity types. Speed is increased since panelists can be quickly selected from an engaged pool, rather than the need to secure new candidates for each phase.


We hope you found this summary to be helpful!  If you didn’t register for this webinar you can watch this webinar in its entirety by clicking here.

Be on the lookout for our next webinar, which will be in August 2023.  If you can’t wait until then, you can always view our on-demand webinars.  Don’t forget to join our mailing list so you can keep up with what is happening at L&E!

A Prescription for Better Research in 2023: How to Make In-Person Healthcare Research Safe and Effective

DWG Admin on February 7, 2023

A Prescription for Better Research in 2023: How to Make In-Person Healthcare Research Safe and Effective

When the pandemic began in March of 2020, our industry had to (quickly!) figure out how to continue conducting research when stay-at-home orders were implemented.  Researchers had to adapt their methodologies to be more inclusive of remote options.  In our latest webinar, we discussed these necessary modifications to processes and methodologies with researchers in the healthcare space.   L&E Research, along with many companies, had the good fortune of being remotely based for years prior to 2020, so existing processes and metrics were already in place, but we promptly realized that the fortunate were in the minority.  Many companies operated from an office or a central location, and had to adapt their internal or operational processes for remote work.  Not only was there an adaptation to their internal processes, but researchers who conducted in-person research had to additionally adapt the research process.  On the other hand, some researchers were already conducting remote research, so their modifications were minimal.  Those who were working remotely and conducting research remotely had a much easier transition than those who had to change both internal and research processes.   During our webinar we had the opportunity to talk with two researchers who had very different perspectives: one was conducting almost all research remotely already so the changes made were more about strengthening internal processes to increase efficiency, rather than how to continue the work; the other researcher was conducting almost all research in-person and had to make significant leaps to adapt their processes.   The pandemic temporarily halted in-person research, but that halt was the catalyst behind a great deal of innovation in qualitative research.  New processes were developed based on the research needed.

  • When travel bans were implemented for many researchers, but in-person research still needed to be conducted, we worked with our clients to develop and perfect a process that we call Remote Moderation.  Facility staff are trained to be the client’s “boots on the ground” when the researcher cannot be in the same physical space as the participant.  In addition to the usual services you would expect from a facility partner, we ensure paperwork is completed, we reset the room, often including the device being tested, and can instruct or direct the participant when necessary.  The moderator conducts the session remotely via a video conferencing platform, without the need for travel.
  • Home Use Testing (HUT or IHUT) was frequently used to replace in-person usability testing when possible.  Traditionally home use testing is conducted by participants coming into a facility to pick up a product, then test it from their own home for a predetermined amount of time.  During the pandemic, we shipped test devices when that was an option for our clients, which eliminated the need for face-to-face contact. Of course, some products or devices are ineligible for HUT due to intellectual property, size limitations, or price limitations, and those still need to be conducted in-person.
  • After the initial stay-at-home orders were lifted in early summer of 2020, in-person research started to slowly return.  Many clients opted to conduct one-on-one interviews rather than focus groups to limit the risk of possible viral transmission, which reduced the amount of people in the facility at any given time, making it safer for both clients and facility staff.  In addition to reducing the head count in our facility, we implemented multiple improvements to minimize contact, such as electronic sign-in and check-out processes, including incentive distribution via e-gift card, limiting people in shared spaces (i.e. asking them to wait in their car rather than a lobby), mask mandates, touch-free doors, electrostatic sprayers, plexiglass dividers, mandatory surface sanitization between sessions, and more.  In retrospect, we may have gone overboard, but the modifications decreased the risk of transmission, and everyone involved felt like their safety was the number one priority.

There were some misconceptions about healthcare provider recruitment during the pandemic. Many clients delayed their research due to an incorrect assumption that physicians would not be available for research.  This was not indicative of our recruiting experience.  Acute care physicians and practitioners were definitely strained during the pandemic, but non-emergency service providers experienced a slowdown.  Because of stay-at-home orders, many elective procedures were canceled or postponed, so some practitioners experienced a decrease in work over the course of the pandemic.  We saw a higher response rate within our healthcare panel because practitioners suddenly had a lot of free time on their hands and wanted to participate in market research, especially and specifically, remote-based research.   There was an increase of fraudulent behavior, so recruiters had to be very diligent about vetting recruits, especially in the healthcare space, since incentives are higher, therefore more alluring.  Healthcare professionals were validated via online resources to confirm that they were in the profession they stated, and patients had to provide proof of prescription, diagnosis, and/or therapies used before being scheduled for sessions.   Now that we are on the other side of the pandemic…or at least moving toward it, what do we anticipate for the future?  At the core, we’ve learned that we have to be flexible and we have to adapt.  Review internal processes to see if there’s room to streamline or reduce costs.  Research should be fit-for-purpose, so if it can be effectively conducted remotely, why would you want to spend more?  When it comes to device usability or sensory testing, in-person research isn’t going away.  Strive to find a balance and use both remote and in-person methodologies, as there will always be value in utilizing a variety of strategies.   We hope you found this summary to be helpful!  If you didn’t register for this webinar you can watch this webinar in its entirety by clicking here.   Be on the lookout for our next webinar, which will be in Spring of 2023.  If you can’t wait until then, you can always view our on-demand webinars.  Don’t forget to join our mailing list so you can keep up with what is happening at L&E!

The Latest in Qualitative Research Technology – Part 1

DWG Admin on September 23, 2021

Covid-19 Changed the Way We Conducted Research

Covid-19 impacted the market research industry in a countless number of ways. L&E Research, like many other qualitative research firms that offer in-person facility solutions, saw a drastic decline in face-to-face research. While researchers were already exploring remote options including asynchronous activities like bulletin boards, shop-alongs, home-use tests, and diaries, these were never meant to replace the importance and value of having a conversation in a one-on-one or group setting with a live audience.

The pandemic led to an increase in conducting synchronous sessions via video-conferencing software, and an overall increase in asynchronous research. But what about the projects that still needed to be conducted face-to-face? Qualitative research firms that offer in-person facility solutions had to implement changes that would reduce risk for all parties involved. By making their facilities as safe as possible for staff, clients, and participants, in-person research became a viable option once again.

Technology made it possible to move research online in a meaningful way, conduct new types of remote research activities, and allowed us to find and utilize new sources of research data.

The Way We Shopped Allowed an Untapped Data Source to Emerge

Of course, market research wasn’t the only activity to see a shift from in-person to online. There was an incredible surge in online shopping over the course of the pandemic – a whopping 32.4% increase over the previous year (https://www.digitalcommerce360.com/article/us-ecommerce-sales/). As review platforms such as Yogi saw an increase in the volume of online reviews and ratings, brands began to realize the importance of this previously untapped data source. It contains a wealth of unbiased feedback that simply needs to be analyzed in order for valuable insights to be found.

As New Tools Were Needed to Analyze This Data – Enter AI

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the next step in automation when working with large amounts of data. While  AI does not replace the insights professional, AI organizes and analyzes data and sentiments, which makes teams more efficient by removing menial tasks, such as tagging, collating, and structuring data, from the process. With advancements in AI, researchers can analyze observational data, and not simply base their findings on the “ask environment” (i.e. polling, interviews, etc.).

AI is best utilized when it can support and enhance the role of the researcher, not take the researcher out of the picture. A focus group still needs a trained moderator, and AI cannot replace that. AI can help that moderator achieve greater things with the right technology.

Using Qualitative and Quantitative for Agile Innovation

Research has been moving towards a more inclusive hybrid approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative into the entire innovation cycle. Rather than using an anchored “waterfall” approach, it’s more comprehensive for decision making to now use an “agile” approach that is more frequent and lighter in nature and may include more tools along the way rather than one large strategy. This gives researchers a collection of different types of data to inform their decisions.

Using the combination of these technologies to fulfill research needs could be quite the powerhouse and can leverage both the “observe” and “ask” environments. For example, a company could use Yogi to analyze their reviews and ratings across a variety of sites to identify a problem they may have with a specific product, or perhaps it may reveal an issue with their brand perception of which they were unaware, or it could simply show them how their competitor may be outperforming them. Whatever the case may be, based on their analysis of existing reviews and ratings, using observational data, they have now identified a problem and can develop a purpose statement which will guide the research team on the work that must be accomplished throughout the research process.

Developments in technology go far beyond just helping researchers shift from in-person to remote. With changes in the macro environment like massive shifts to online shopping, researchers need to have the tools to identify new sources of data and analyze them efficiently. AI and other software will never replace the insights professional, but having the right technology can allow research to become faster, more agile and more innovative.

L&E Blog Series: Working in a Virtual Environment – Metrics: The Key To Any Business (Especially When Your Team Works From Home!)

DWG Admin on July 20, 2020

As so many are struggling with their businesses in this new reality we call COVID, we have all been confronted with the reality that the world has changed and a crisis is upon us.  I wanted to share a chapter from a friend who has written a series of books on the subject of entrepreneurship.  Called the “Decision Series,” Randy Nelson has authored two books (with two more on the way) on helping us navigate the business owner cycle.  Here’s a chapter on crisis leadership, and what Randy learned from his time as submarine XO and later successful exit of two companies on how to deal with crisis.

I highly recommend his books for all business owners out there, especially his “Second Decision” on operating your business well. If you read Randy’s chapter or tuned in from my last post on the strategic essentials of working from home, we covered communication and how essential it is for a successful transition to at home work, as an element of the broader need for great leadership for successful outcomes.  Vision, strategy and culture are all critical components of leadership as well, but these are items that really must come from the heart of the leadership of one’s business or division.  Further, countless books have been written on these subjects that could cover these topics far better than I (see Simon Sinek’s “Start with Why,” Jim Collins’ “Good to Great” on strategy and culture and overall leadership, “The 17 indisputable laws of Teamwork” by Thomas Maxwell, and many more).  All of them are well worth the read.

But the one facet of leadership, and one I see most lacking in many businesses, that is particularly crucial when your workforce is more virtual (and covered really well in Randy’s book), is metrics.  As one CEO friend told me years ago, when he asked what my key metrics were and I didn’t have a good answer:

“Brett, if you don’t know the metrics of your business, you’ll never know what makes it successful.  Talking financials only tells part of the story:  what items [that are measurable] that drive those financials are the keys to your business.”

Too often I hear Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) referenced by others as financials.  Profits, revenue, cash flow, these are all very important, but are often data that only you and your CFO or Finance Officer know. If you want to share that data with your employees, I strongly encourage it, but that too will take time and a lot of process.  Jack Stack’s “Great Game of Business” and Geno Wickman’s “Traction” are great reads and systems to consider when going down that path.  They also only tell the outcome, they don’t share how you got there.  Knowing what causes your business to generate profits (revenue is nice, but without profits it’s vanity) is what will lead to high performing teams, as you build out the metrics that enable each teammate to understand where they fit into the bigger company picture.

The ability to know what number(s) each of your teammates should be looking at is the first crucial step in creating a culture of accountability.  The Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM) has regularly published survey results that show employees seek, in this general order:

  1. The ability to influence their working world;
  2. Clear expectations as to what is expected of them;
  3. Being valued and appreciated;
  4. Fair compensation.

Notice compensation is last. Yes, everyone wants to paid well, but so long as their compensation plan is fair, employees really want to know how will the game be played, what part of the game are they expected to play/influence, and what does winning look like?  I like to compare it to games because most all of us grew up playing games of some kind.  Sports, cards, Monopoly, we all know the rules, and we all know what winning looks like.

I find these four elements very intertwined and critical if you are to create an accountable culture.  To me, it starts with #2:  clear expectations.  To have clear expectations, one has to have data, especially when your people are working from home, when all you have is the ability to see the final work product or financial outcomes.  Simply put, your teammates crave objective analysis, because when it is clear to them not only what is expected of them, but also what they are involved in defining, together you both can determine HOW to accomplish it. This also addresses #1, their ability to influence, and even #3 being valued and appreciated, as you will find it easier to value them and show appreciation if you can objectively see they’re helping you make a positive difference.

Once employees feel you both are on the same page, you will begin establishing trust, which is essential between business leaders and their employees to achieve success.  You will get a lot less “why are we doing this?” if they understand what drives the business, and how what they do influences it. This of course gets back to communication we discussed earlier, but you’ll find you spend a lot less time explaining things as you establish trust.  Telling your teammates “Trust me!” is something I found never worked!

Clear expectations thus, derive from metrics that allow you to create a scorecard between you and your employee.  Taking your goals for the year, you can reverse engineer your business to determine what each departments scorecard will look like, and in turn how you will develop the KPIs of each employee within those departments.

If you’re thinking “Yeah sure, it’s so simple!,” you’re right: it’s not.  Considerable thought needs to go into your metrics as a company and what’s driving your success (or what needs to change to make it successful).  From my experience, you’re likely to make a few mistakes as to what you’re measuring, and change the metrics up.  But good news:  my experience is when people see you trying to figure it out and working smart to enable both the company and employees to be successful, they’ll be a whole lot more willing to put up with these mistakes and help solve the problem to make the company successful.

As we all adapt and reimagine our businesses in this new reality, metrics and communication will be crucial as companies consider being more home-based.  In addition to Randy’s Decision Series, I also highly recommend “Traction” by Geno Wickman, as you consider how to thrive in the months ahead and put better metrics and communication systems in place.  If I had one thought to close, it would be don’t let the productivity of your teammates these past few months lull you into a sense of false security.  Many companies have reported seeing their teammates productivity equal to, or increased, during this COVID crisis.  Seeing the job market run high with unemployment and the quarantines forcing people to stay home may be creating “false positives” in productivity.  Make sure your metrics are strong, and you’re constantly evaluating how you can communicate  better in order to ensure everyone in your company is on the same page.

L&E Blog Series: Working in a Virtual Environment – Communication: Part 2

DWG Admin on April 23, 2020

As a follow up to my post last week about communication, I discussed the 5 key tools that we used to help get everyone on the same page to become a remote workforce.  In addition to those, I thought it would be useful to share some of the software/tech tools we use at L&E. So here they are, a few tools we use in our daily work, plus a few things we do as a company throughout the year to enhance our communication with one another.

  • Video Meetings – We hold all of our meetings via video and a good HD webcam on each employee’s laptop enables us to do so. Whether the video platform is through 8×8, Zoom or GoToMeeting, video provides a human connection and dynamic that can’t be achieved through phone/conference calls. We are able to see the background of one another’s homes (and the occasional pet, spouse or child ). This keeps things real, we are human and we LIKE seeing each other’s lives. I have found for new employees this also gives them more familiarity with their new colleagues and helps them get to know one another better before they have the chance to meet in-person.
  • Online Chat Tool – We use G Suite and Google Hangouts is a chat feature within Gmail. Having a chat function available makes it easy to get a quick answer without having to worry if someone is busy, or if you missed a call. Furthermore, it reduces the amount of congestion in inboxes and is a great internal communication tool.
  • Shared System – I mentioned Smartsheet specifically in the last blog post. It’s a shared workspace tool that everyone can access and make changes to in real time. It solves the problem of not having the most current document that may have been shared or emailed back and forth multiple times. It’s where we set our goals and metrics, discuss issues at hand and create our to-do’s. It’s something we come back to in each meeting to guide us and help us so that we are held accountable in actions following every meeting.

Example of Smartsheet workspace below:

Smartsheet workspace

  • Small Team Meetings – Keeping our team meetings smaller helps us stay focused on the goals/metrics of the departments we work within, makes it easier to bond in a smaller group setting and for the most part keeps our meetings shorter and within our desired time limits. We have cross-departmental meetings (which are small as well), but these are with each department head vs. the whole team. This makes good use of each team’s time and when there is something pertinent that needs to be passed down from the department leader they are then able to regroup in their own small teams.
  • Polaris Learning System – This is an online learning academy that our team has been utilizing since 2017. While you may wonder how this is part of communication, there are courses in the following chapters (and yes, communication is one of the courses!): Self Development, Communication Skills, Time Management, Decision-Making Skills, Goal Achievement and Leadership & Management. You can check out the Polaris website and learn more about the coursework offered with this sample course module.

L&E Blog Series: Working in a Virtual Environment – Communication

DWG Admin on April 15, 2020

As many on our team have written about tricks to help your day-to-day strategy on working from home, in this blog post –  I’d like to talk more about the overall company and its approach to working as a team.  So for those leading teams, or even companies and are dealing with a virtual workforce for the first time in this new “normal,” I’m talking to you!

For many, this rapid transition from working in an office to working at home has led to a lot of challenges.  I am sure everyone is quickly realizing that the things that were likely taken for granted when everyone was in one space are now “oh wow” moments that have presented new challenges to leaders as to how to get their teams to continue to be productive, as well as measuring effectiveness.

Prior to diving deeper into the challenges of the virtual workforce and building effective teams virtually, it’s important to highlight what all businesses must have throughout the organization to be successful:  leadership.  It took me years (and some embarrassing experiences) to realize leadership wasn’t speeches or “larger than life” personalities.  Leadership is action that people commit to daily in order to inspire and comfort others, and this results in people’s comfort following their lead.  While there are varied attributes, I have ascribed to the six following elements of leadership:

  • Authenticity: I’ve been around orators, and I’ve been around people that might have said five words in a meeting.  Some spoke with their hands, and some looked like they barely had a pulse.  Leaders come in all different forms, but the key is authenticity, being true to themselves.
  • Vision: knowing where one wants to go, what goals are to be set out and accomplished.
  • Strategy: how do we intend to get there?  What’s the plan?
  • Culture: what are the common beliefs we all agree are the principles of our team?  Many often use words like “integrity” or “compassion” or “teamwork”:  noble principles, but don’t forget there was no integrity witnessed in “Wolf of Wall Street,” although they were a tightly bonded (and highly successful) team.  And Blackbeard likely had little compassion for non-performers or those disloyal to him and his ship, but the loyalty of his men was notorious in those times.  Culture is the environment that teams agree to embrace, and not tolerate from others that don’t embrace it.  It’s also a big part of the language, the common reference everyone on the team understands.
  • Metrics: humans perform as a result of the rewards they will receive for achieving those measures (and rewards come in many forms and aren’t always financial). Our ability to agree on what those rewards will be, and what each side (employer and employee) must do in order to earn those rewards, how to measure what a “great job” means, is critical.

Finally, the one I will focus on in this post is communication.  If your team does not know what the vision is, the plan to get there, what we all agree are the rules and expectations, and how we all know when the journey will be successful…you don’t have anything.  Simply put, ensuring the team knows what is going on is crucial, but probably the least thought out and most poorly executed within companies.

As a backdrop, when L&E made its transition to a virtual workforce in 2009, we shortly thereafter made our first expansion in Tampa, Florida.  There were two main employees that were added to the team, and roughly 10 employees overall to our existing team of 30.  My biggest surprise was discovering how often the team was having “miscommunications.”  Balls were regularly getting dropped. Misinformation was as common as accurate information. The success of our new office was genuinely in jeopardy.  Clearly, we had some problems to solve if we were going to succeed.

Fortunately, over 400 employees later, we did figure it out.  For effective communications, we implemented 5 key tools to help us get everyone on the same page.

  1. Meetings: first off, let’s be clear that meetings are useless unless they are effective. You can learn all you want about effective meetings from “Traction” by Geno Wickman.  I can’t endorse his business operating system highly enough.  It’s a short read, and overall not an overly costly system to follow, even with outside help.  But I’ll just share that the keys to effective meetings break down into 4 parts:  they must have an agenda, they must require people are engaged (e.g. not doing email while they are meeting), they must have action items that result from the meetings (who’s going to do it, who’s responsible for it, and when’s it going to happen) and finally, they require a leader who is going to follow through and hold people accountable to those action items.  If something is more intense, you may require greater meeting frequency, but for typical department operations, once a week I find works well, and must include what Wickman calls “cascading messages”:  data that should either go outside the meeting to others, or sometimes messages that should be conveyed to the team prior to meeting start (which would be part of the agenda).
  2. Company surveys: good communication isn’t just about telling people things; in fact, it is more about listening to what others have to say.  Sometimes it’s to better form strategies; sometimes it’s to get buy in, and sometimes, it’s because people need to talk, and a leader’s job is to listen, and to empathize with your teammate. But I find an annual survey (and I also like a short “pulse check” 6 months later) of how happy your team is, and finding out what they think would make the company better, is an instrumental tool in your listening tool kit. In time, assuming companies are acting on the survey, teammates will trust their leaders more.  That leads to teammates thinking about how to make the company better more regularly:  they’ll take ownership of the business and its outcomes. This goes a long way to having an engaged team, one that cares about the business and its success.
  3. Use a commonly accessible system where information can be stored. Don’t think emails out to the team are going to be effective forms of communication!  Just like your inbox, your teammates email box is full of…emails!  They get deleted, they get overlooked and sometimes even more crippling, they can lead to “reply all” conversations that don’t solve problems (in fact they usually create more). Email is the most overused, and most abused, and least effective, method of communication.  Unless it’s a short response or confirmation of action, email should always be avoided.

Instead, use systems that can document and keep permanent record of the goals sought after.  There are considerable systems online out there one can use to track and post content for teams to reference. Google docs and spreadsheets, Smartsheets, Microsoft has a full suite just to name a few, the point is to have a place where teammates can go when questions arise, what they should reference.  And a “Wickman” rule I really like: document 20% that covers 80% of your business.  But remember unlike your in-office days, no one can knock on your door to ask a quick question, and that absence of convenience (beyond the normal stress of what is COVID-19) is likely to result in more people not being productive. And if I can implore you to remember one thing, it is this:  your team is stressed, and productivity is not going to be normal (both the new environment and stress): be patient!  People will settle in, but it will take time.

  1. Regular “broadcasts.” Leverage tools like Zoom or GoToMeeting or others and once a quarter, talk to your team and answer their questions.  Tell them what’s going on, share the vision, the strategy, emphasize the culture, and then answer questions. I also like to visit teams regularly. Despite having nearly a dozen offices, I visit them all at least twice a year. But with the current crisis, having the team SEE you, HEAR you, and watch you respond and answer their questions demonstrates your willingness to share, to listen and to engage. Your team needs that, which leads to my 5th communication key.
  2. Repeat yourself…a lot! A famous quote from a Fortune 500 CEO when asked what he spends most of his day doing, his answer was “repeating myself.” Remember what you said probably only a few people heard. Whether it was because they’d never heard you say it before, or because humans generally need several impressions for the message to stick, repeating yourself becomes an important strategy. And a hard lesson I had to learn: be consistent. I’d try to say the same thing, but use different words or analogies, convoluting the message (still struggle with this actually, working to be better!). Saying it the same way, focusing on the same key points (3 is recommended), reinforcing the message to everyone consistently and being concise is most effective in getting people on the same page and, working together.

And if after reading this you’re thinking “I don’t run my company or my department, so what can I do?”  remember that you can be the biggest influencer of policy, as you are a member of the team.  All of you have good leaders where you work: those leaders will not only need your support during this harrowing time, they’ll also be listening for good ideas that they can implement. This gets back to good communication: good leaders want to hear your opinions, just make sure you offer them the right way.  That means you aren’t telling them, you’re sharing what you are seeing, how you care and want to see the company succeed and demonstrating respect for their position.  In other words, you aren’t complaining, you’re problem solving.  And another favorite word of mine, you’re being PROACTIVE.  You want to help and you’re volunteering to help implement whatever strategies leadership decides to implement. As Mark Cuban says: “[People] who reduce my stress, become invaluable to me!”

One of the things I’m most proud of at L&E are our employee happiness measures that show over 4 in 5 employees would highly recommend working at L&E to friends and colleagues (as a comparison, most companies in the services industry according to the Society of Human Resource Management are in the 50s to low 60s).  Good communication is critical to that end. And happy teammates are productive ones that embrace the company’s best interests. I hope this content has been helpful in creating a more effective virtual team in your organization.

Next time I’ll share what we have learned at L&E about metrics, and how to create measures that allow you and your teams to operative effectively, regardless of your location.

L&E Blog Series: Working in a Virtual Environment – Stress Relief

DWG Admin on April 7, 2020

We are in week #3 of our blog series, hopefully you are settling into some sort of routine to help you make your work day a little bit more manageable. Our focus this week is stress relief because let’s be honest, the amount of stress and anxiety in our lives is quite high right now. We know you aren’t going to meditate on top of a mountain (unless you live in the mountains!) like the stock photo we used for this blog post, but this is a fantastic visualization tool and/or image to look at daily. Some of us have probably never dealt with this kind of uncertainty so we wanted to share a couple “de-stresser” tips from our employees.

Take a few deep breaths and read below to learn what helps L&E employees relieve stress:

  • Watch a funny or inspiring clip from a favorite TV show, a good laugh always helps us de-stress. A favorite of ours is from the wonderful John Krasinski : SGN Watch this week’s clip – Scott Johnson, St. Louis Client Services Manager
  • And who doesn’t need more than one clip to brighten their day, here is another favorite from our team. This clip was sent over from Tyler Johnson, Client Relationship Manager
  • Connect with your teammates regularly, it always helps talking it out. Specifically during these times, utilize video technology to stay in touch! – April Leonard, Medical Project Director
  • Make your space extra comfortable – buy a plant so you have some greenery on your desk and turn on an essential oil diffuser (lavender works as a natural anxiety reliever). You can control the atmosphere so try to make it as stress free as possible! – Kaitlin Plave, Account Manager
  • Take a lunch break:  One of my favorite WFH benefits is the freedom to prepare lunch at lunchtime (as opposed to packing a lunch before going to the office), or simply heat up some leftovers.  I also try to walk my dogs during this break time – a midday “fresh air” break is very relaxing and gets me on track to finish the day.  The important part is to simply get up and take a break! – Kelli Hammock, Senior Client Solutions Manager
  • In addition to taking some time daily to laugh (or cry), exercise is always a great stress reducer to help balance body and mind. – Brett Watkins, CEO

Be on the lookout for our next blog post in this series coming next week!

Posts pagination

1 2 3 Next
L&E Research

Focus areas

  • L&E Health
  • L&E Consumer
  • L&E Insights
  • L&E Legal
  • CondUX.io

Capabilities

  • Qualitative & Quantitative Recruitment
  • Video Streaming
  • Virtual and Remote Facilities
  • Partnerships
  • Client Portal

Facilities

  • Charlotte
  • Chicago
  • Cincinnati
  • Columbus
  • Denver
  • New York City
  • Orlando
  • Raleigh
  • Tampa

Keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter

Linkedin-in X-twitter Youtube
  • © L&E Research
  • PRIVACY